iso4217:DKK391236492017-11-292017-12-31391236492017-11-292017-12-311391236492017-11-292017-12-311391236492017-11-292017-12-312391236492017-11-292017-12-313391236492017-11-292017-12-314391236492017-11-292017-12-315391236492017-11-292017-12-316391236492017-11-292017-12-311391236492017-11-292017-12-312391236492017-12-31391236492017-11-29391236492017-11-292017-12-3141RevisionspåtegningÅrsrapport39123649IGM Biosciences A/SHaldor Topsøes Allé12800Kgs. LyngbyDenmark2017-11-292017-12-312018-05-30Henrik Gaarn BakFred Max SchwarzerMichael Dewey LobergNelson Nan-Hsiong TengChristina Teng TopsøeJakob Haldor TopsøeHenrik TopsøeDana Roy LeachChairman3377123133771231PricewaterhouseCoopers Statsautoriseret RevisionspartnerselskabPricewaterhouseCoopers Statsautoriseret Revisionspartnerselskab39123649IGM Biosciences A/SHaldor Topsøes Allé 12800 Kgs. LyngbyTo the shareholders of IGM Biosciences A/SIn our opinion, the Financial Statements give a true and fair view of the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2017 and of the results of the Company’s operations as well as the cash flows for the financial year November 29 to December 31, 2017 in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the EU and further requirements in the Danish Financial Statements Act.<br/><br/>We have audited the Financial Statements of IGM Biosciences A/S for the financial year November 29 - December 31, 2017, which comprise income statement, balance sheet, statement of changes in equity, cash flow statement and notes, including a summary of significant accounting policies as well as statement of comprehensive income (“financial statements”).We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (ISAs) and the additional requirements applicable in Denmark. Our responsibilities under those standards and requirements are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements section of our report. We are independent of the Company in accordance with the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants’ Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (IESBA Code) and the additional requirements applicable in Denmark, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.Management is responsible for Management’s review.<br/><br/>Our opinion on the financial statements does not cover Management’s review, and we do not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.<br/><br/>In connection with our audit of the financial statements, our responsibility is to read Management’s review and, in doing so, consider whether Management’s review is materially inconsistent with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained during the audit, or otherwise appears to be materially misstated.<br/><br/>Moreover, it is our responsibility to consider whether Management’s review provides the information required under the Danish Financials Statements Act.<br/><br/>Based on the work we have performed, in our view, Management’s review is in accordance with the Financial Statements and has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Danish Financial Statement Act. We did not identify any material misstatement in Management’s review.Management is responsible for the preparation of Financial Statements that give a true and fair view in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the EU and further requirements in the Danish Financial Statements Act, and for such internal control as Management determines is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.<br/><br/>In preparing the financial statements, Management is responsible for assessing the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting in preparing the financial statements unless Management either intends to liquidate the Company or to cease operations, or has no realistic alternative but to do so.Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs and the additional requirements applicable in Denmark will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial statements.<br/><br/>As part of an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs and the additional requirements applicable in Denmark, we exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit. We also:<br/><br/>• Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain audit evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control.<br/>• Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control.<br/>• Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates and related disclosures made by Management.<br/>• Conclude on the appropriateness of Management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting in preparing the financial statements and, based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. If we conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we are required to draw attention in our auditor’s report to the related disclosures in the financial statements or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to modify our opinion. Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor’s report. However, future events or conditions may cause the Company to cease to continue as a going concern.<br/>• Evaluate the overall presentation, structure and contents of the financial statements, including the disclosures, and whether the financial statements represent the underlying transactions and events in a manner that gives a true and fair view.<br/><br/>We communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and significant audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal control that we identify during our audit.Copenhagen2018-05-24Mikkel SthyrMaj-Britt Nørskov NannestadState Authorized Public AccountantState Authorized Public Accountantmne26693mne32198577000-57700092000-669000-89000-5800000-5800009001000204809000106200021487200021833000218330002367050008900089000319940000320830002687880003734000-580000167300001988400021495800021495800032000000194600033946000248904000268788000-13660001946000092000-92000214872000-214872000214958000Loan from parent company3200000024695800031994000